rete
New Member
Posts: 5
|
Post by rete on Nov 19, 2016 12:17:07 GMT -5
Recently I requested and received samples of your resins in order to evaluate for strength and ability to easily be machined.
The samples were: Performance 80D Alumilite Regular - Black
As it turns out both resins will meet my requirements. The deciding factor most likely will come to how to achieve the best results in how I intend to do the actual casting.
The casting I will be doing is very simple design and will be utilizing an open top. "envelope" type silicone mold. In order cut time and expense I would prefer not to use vacuum or pressure in the casting process.
From what I gather from reading on your website about these two resins it appears that the Alumilite might be more suited to my needs. Would this be the correct assumption? My goal would to have the casting be as free as possible form trapped air bubbles on the surface. Would my casting technique with P80D be more prone to having these air bubbles show up in the final product? If that in fact is the situation, why is it that P80D is more prone to having trapped air bubbles?
If I did have to utilize a pressure pot, for best results, what is the minimum PSI I would have to maintain?
|
|
|
Post by mike on Nov 22, 2016 8:23:53 GMT -5
Yes, Alumilite Regular Black would be my recommendation ... simply put ... it is thinner, does not require vacuum or pressure casting, has a shorter open/demold time which allows you to cycle parts more quickly.
The Performance 80D is thicker, slower, and requires vacuum or pressure. The advantage of the Perf 80D is that it has some absolutely incredible physical properties that go with it ... incredible elongation, impact, and flex strength within a very rigid casting system. Many times these physical properties are very much over kill and not worth the added processing requirements.
Mike
|
|
rete
New Member
Posts: 5
|
Post by rete on Nov 22, 2016 15:03:29 GMT -5
Thanks! That confirms what I had thought.
I'll be making a purchase soon.
|
|